首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Atrazine in Drinking Water from Agricultural Activities and Policy Implications
【2h】

Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Atrazine in Drinking Water from Agricultural Activities and Policy Implications

机译:农业活动中饮用水中At去津的风险成本效益分析及其政策意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study provides an improved methodology for investigating the trade-offs between the health risks and economic benefits of using atrazine in the agricultural sector. Regression models are developed to predict finished water atrazine concentration in high-risk community water supplies in the US. The predicted finished water atrazine concentrations are then incorporated in a health risk assessment. The computed health risks are compared with total economic surplus in the US corn market for different atrazine application rates using estimated demand and supply functions. Analysis of different scenarios with consumer price premiums for chemical-free and reducedchemical corn indicate that banning the use of atrazine may have adverse economic impacts. However, if the society is willing to pay a price premium, risks can be reduced without a large reduction in the total economic surplus and net benefits may be higher. The results also show that this methodology provides an improved scientific framework for future decision-making and policy evaluation in pesticide management, especially when better regional and national data become available.
机译:这项研究提供了一种改进的方法,用于研究在农业部门使用at去津的健康风险和经济利益之间的取舍。开发了回归模型来预测美国高危社区供水中的成品water去津浓度。然后将预计的最终水at去津浓度纳入健康风险评估。使用估计的需求和供应函数,将计算得出的健康风险与不同阿特拉津施用量下美国玉米市场的总经济盈余进行比较。对不含化学药品和化学还原玉米的消费者价格溢价的不同情景进行的分析表明,禁止使用at去津可能会对经济产生不利影响。但是,如果社会愿意支付价格溢价,则可以在不大幅减少总经济盈余的情况下降低风险,并且净收益可能更高。结果还表明,该方法为农药管理中的未来决策和政策评估提供了一个改进的科学框架,尤其是在可以获得更好的地区和国家数据时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号